Pick your models
Choose the Simple or churn-based LTV method, and whether to compute CAC from spend or enter it directly.
LTV:CAC ratio, payback, and max CAC you can afford — on gross profit.
Updated Reviewed by Sajid Hussain· Editor
The LTV:CAC ratio is the single metric that tells you whether your growth is sustainable: it divides the lifetime gross profit per customer (LTV) by what you paid to acquire them (CAC). Below 1:1 you lose money on every new customer; the 3:1 benchmark means three times what you spent in acquisition comes back in profit. This LTV CAC calculator finds the ratio, payback period, and the maximum CAC you can afford to hit your target — working on gross profit, not revenue, so the number actually means something.
The LTV:CAC ratio is the headline number. It divides lifetime gross profit per customer by what you paid to acquire them. The benchmark is 3:1: below 1:1 you lose money on every customer; 1–3:1 is thin; 3–5:1 is healthy; above 5:1 is strong but often means you're under-investing in growth. Just as important is the CAC payback period — how many months it takes to earn that acquisition cost back. A 2:1 ratio that pays back in 6 months can be healthier for ecommerce cash-flow than a 5:1 ratio that takes two years.
The #1 mistake: computing LTV on revenue, not profit. A customer who spends 200 over their lifetime at a 45% margin is only worth 90 in profit — so a flattering 6.7:1 revenue ratio is really a 3:1 profit ratio. This tool computes LTV on gross profit by default and shows the revenue figure only as a contrast, with a warning, so you never make that comparison by accident.
Both LTV models in one tool — no competitor does this. The Simple model (AOV × purchases/year × margin × lifespan) for repeat-purchase ecommerce sellers, and the churn-based model (÷ churn rate) for subscriptions — with the conversion shown both ways (50% churn = a 2-year lifespan). Pick whichever matches the data you actually have.
Max affordable CAC — the planning number founders actually need. Enter a target ratio and the tool reverses to your max affordable CAC — the ceiling you can bid up to and still hit your goal — plus the headroom versus what you spend today. It also shows how a small retention gain (one more half-purchase a year) moves the ratio, because lifting repeat rate is almost always cheaper than buying more customers. Works in any currency — no rates, no conversion, universal math.
Quick facts
Four short steps — under a minute.
Choose the Simple or churn-based LTV method, and whether to compute CAC from spend or enter it directly.
Your marketing spend and new customers, or a CAC you already track.
AOV, purchases per year, gross margin, and how long customers stay (or your churn rate).
Get LTV, the ratio, payback, a health verdict, and the max CAC you can afford to hit your target.
Steps to use the LTV CAC Calculator: Pick your models, Enter CAC, Enter economics, Read the verdict.
Standard unit-economics math, in plain algebra — every figure on gross profit.
What it costs to win one customer. Or enter a CAC you already track. Use blended CAC for a whole-business view, paid-only CAC to judge paid channels.
The profit a retained customer generates each year. The margin term is what turns revenue into real, comparable value.
For repeat-purchase ecommerce when you know roughly how long customers stay. Always on gross profit.
For subscriptions or when you track churn. Implied lifespan = 1 ÷ churn, so 50% churn = a 2-year lifespan — the two methods reconcile exactly at the same lifespan.
The ratio is the headline health metric; payback is how fast the cash comes back. Both matter — fast payback beats a high ratio that takes years.
The ceiling you can spend per customer and still hit your goal. Headroom = max CAC − current CAC tells you how much acquisition budget is unused (or overspent).
Watch the gross-profit framing change the story.
Scenario
A brand with a $50.00 AOV, $2.00 purchases/year, a $45.00% gross margin, a $2.00-year customer lifespan, and a CAC (blended) CAC. Sustainable?
$50.00 × $2.00 purchases × $45.00% margin = $45.00/year. (Note the margin — without it you'd wrongly use $100.00 of revenue.)
Annual gross profit: $45.00
$45.00/year × $2.00 years = $90.00. Revenue LTV would be $200.00 — but that's not profit, so never compare it to CAC.
LTV: $90.00 (not $200.00)
Ratio = $90.00 ÷ CAC (blended) = $3.00:1 — right on the healthy 3:1 mark. Monthly gross profit is $45.00 ÷ 12 = $3.75, so payback = CAC (blended) ÷ $3.75 = $8.00 months.
Ratio $3.00:1 · payback $8.00 months
To hold a 3:1 target, you can spend up to $90.00 ÷ 3 = $30.00 per customer. You're at CAC (blended) — right at the limit, no headroom to bid higher without lifting LTV first.
Max CAC: $30.00
The takeaway
A textbook-healthy 3:1. The fastest lever isn't spending more — it's retention: nudging repeat purchases from 2 to 2.5/year lifts LTV to $112.50 and the ratio to 3.75:1 with zero extra CAC.
Standard benchmarks. Ecommerce ratios run lower than SaaS because gross margins are lower (40–60% vs 70–85%).
| Metric | Poor | Average | Good | Excellent |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV:CAC ratio Corporate Finance Institute LTV/CAC Ratio Guide 2025 | < 1:1 | 1–3:1 | 3–5:1 | 4–5:1 |
CAC payback (months) Stripe CAC Payback Period Guide 2025 | > 18 | 12–18 | 6–12 | < 6 |
Gross margin (ecom) NYU Stern Sector Margins 2025 | < 30% | 30–45% | 45–60% | 60%+ |
Repeat purchase rate Yotpo State of Brand Loyalty Report 2025 | < 15% | 15–30% | 30–50% | 50%+ |
Annual churn Klaviyo Ecommerce Benchmark Report 2025 | > 70% | 50–70% | 30–50% | < 30% |
SaaS tools only do churn-based LTV; ecommerce tools only do simple — and most compute LTV on revenue. We fix all three.
| Feature | Calcrux | Shopify Analytics | Klaviyo |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTV on gross profit (not revenue) | Often revenue | ||
| Simple AND churn-based LTV | One or the other | Churn only | |
| CAC payback period | Some | ||
| Max affordable CAC (reverse) | Rare | ||
| Health verdict + benchmarks | Some | ||
| Retention sensitivity readout | |||
| Revenue-LTV trap warning | |||
| Works in any currency, free | Most US-only |
Why it matters
A customer who spends 200 lifetime at 45% margin is worth 90 in profit. Using the 200 makes a 3:1 profit ratio look like a flattering 6.7:1 — and justifies overspending on acquisition.
Fix
Always use gross-profit LTV. We do by default and warn whenever the revenue figure would mislead.
Why it matters
A 5:1 ratio sounds great, but if payback takes 24 months you're funding acquisition and inventory out of pocket for two years. Cash, not just the ratio, kills ecommerce brands.
Fix
Read the ratio and the payback period together. Under 12 months keeps cash flowing.
Why it matters
Assuming a 5-year lifespan when most customers buy twice and vanish inflates LTV and hides an unsustainable model. Garbage lifespan in, garbage ratio out.
Fix
Use real cohort data. If unsure, use churn-based LTV from a measured churn rate — it's harder to fool yourself.
Why it matters
Blended CAC (all spend ÷ all new customers) includes free/organic customers, flattering the number. Paid CAC judges paid channels honestly. Comparing a paid-channel LTV to blended CAC is apples to oranges.
Fix
Be consistent. Use blended for the whole-business view, paid CAC to evaluate paid acquisition.
Why it matters
A 5:1+ ratio often means you're acquiring too slowly and leaving growth on the table. The "best" ratio isn't the highest — it's the one that maximizes profitable growth.
Fix
If your ratio is well above 3:1 with fast payback, use the max-affordable-CAC headroom to scale acquisition.
Why it matters
LTV isn't destiny — it's the most movable number you have. A small lift in repeat rate or AOV compounds across the whole customer base for zero extra CAC.
Fix
Use the retention sensitivity readout: often a half-purchase more per year beats any acquisition tactic.
Lifting repeat purchases is usually cheaper than buying customers — and it raises LTV across everyone you've ever acquired.
Higher order value flows straight into LTV (at your margin) without touching CAC. Bundles, upsells, and minimums all help.
Because LTV is on profit, a few points of margin move the ratio more than most acquisition tactics. Watch discounting and fees.
Shorter payback frees cash to reinvest sooner. Faster-paying channels can fund faster growth even at a lower ratio.
If max-affordable-CAC sits well above your current CAC, you have room to bid up and acquire faster while staying healthy.
New product mix, a price change, or a fee increase all move margin and LTV. Re-run the numbers before scaling spend.
The LTV CAC Calculator works across every stage of the workflow.
Find the max CAC you can afford at a 3:1 target, then set channel bids and budgets against that ceiling.
Show a defensible, gross-profit LTV:CAC ratio and payback — the unit economics every investor asks for.
A ratio below 3:1 says fix retention/margin first; well above 3:1 with fast payback says scale acquisition.
Run paid CAC per channel against the same LTV to see which acquisition channels actually pay back.
Use churn-based LTV for a subscription line and Simple for a one-time product, in the same tool.
See how a loyalty program that lifts repeat rate changes LTV and the ratio before you build it.
Every important term you'll encounter in this calculator and the broader topic.
Everything you need to know about how the LTV CAC Calculator works.
The classic benchmark is 3:1 — about three times what you paid to acquire a customer. Below 1:1 is unsustainable; 1–3:1 is thin; 3–5:1 is healthy; above 5:1 is strong but often signals under-investing in growth. Ecommerce ratios run lower than SaaS because gross margins are lower (40–60% vs 70–85%).
Gross profit — always. A customer who spends 200 at a 45% margin generates only 90 in profit. Using revenue (200) makes a real 3:1 ratio look like a flattering 6.7:1, leading to overspending. This calculator uses gross-profit LTV by default and shows revenue LTV as contrast only, with a warning.
CAC payback = CAC ÷ monthly gross profit per customer. Under 6 months is ideal; 6–12 is acceptable; over 12 is risky for ecommerce since you fund acquisition and inventory until the customer turns profitable. A 2:1 ratio with 6-month payback can be healthier than a 5:1 ratio that takes two years.
CAC = sales & marketing spend ÷ new customers in the same period. Include ad spend, agency fees, and acquisition salaries; exclude retention. Blended CAC gives a whole-business view; paid CAC judges paid channels honestly. The calculator computes it, or you can enter your own.
Simple LTV = AOV × purchases/year × gross margin × lifespan. Churn-based LTV = (AOV × purchases/year × gross margin) ÷ annual churn rate. They reconcile: 50% churn = 2-year lifespan. This tool offers both so you can use whichever data you have.
Max affordable CAC = LTV ÷ target ratio. At an LTV of 90 and a 3:1 target, you can spend up to 30. The calculator shows this ceiling plus headroom vs your actual CAC: positive = unused budget to grow faster; negative = overspending. This is the number founders need for budgeting.
Mostly gross margin. SaaS runs 70–85% margins so most revenue becomes profit. Ecommerce runs 40–60% because of product cost, shipping, and fulfilment — compressing profit LTV. That's also why computing LTV on profit, not revenue, matters more in ecommerce.
Cash velocity. The ratio tells you whether a customer is eventually profitable; payback tells you how fast. A 2:1 ratio with 6-month payback can be healthier than a 5:1 ratio that takes 24 months — a common way "profitable on paper" ecommerce brands run out of cash. Read both together.
Blended CAC divides all acquisition spend by all new customers (including organic). It flatters the number because free customers cost nothing. Paid CAC counts only paid-channel customers — the honest cost of buying growth. Use blended for whole-business health, paid CAC to judge paid channels.
Yes. Fully global and currency-agnostic: enter every monetary value in your own currency and all results are shown in that currency. No exchange rates or conversions — ratios, months, and percentages are universal. The benchmarks (3:1 ratio, sub-12-month payback) are international standards.
Four levers: raise repeat-purchase rate (cheapest — lifts LTV across everyone you've acquired), increase AOV, protect gross margin (LTV is on profit, so margin matters a lot), or cut CAC. The retention sensitivity readout shows how much a half-purchase more per year would raise your ratio.
No — this uses nominal LTV (no discounting for the time value of money). For most ecommerce models with 1–3 year lifespans the difference is small. For lifespans of 5+ years or formal DCF valuations, treat the LTV here as a slight overstatement and apply your own discount rate.
Keep exploring
True Amazon ad ROAS, break-even, and the max CPC you can profitably bid.
Calculate your AOV, get a free-shipping floor, and model what a lift is worth.
All three P&L margins stacked in one view, with markup conversion — any currency.
Minimum profitable ROAS for any channel — break-even, target, and ACoS.
Category
Ecommerce Seller Operations
Subcategory
financial profitability
Availability
Global · 9 markets
Price
Free forever
Topics
Calculators, simulators, and decision tools for every stage of business operations.
Results update in real time as you type — no submit needed.
Your numbers
Results
Results appear as you type
No submit button needed
Decision lab
The ratio tells you if today's spend is healthy; this works the other way. Set the LTV:CAC you want to run at and it shows the most you can pay to acquire a customer — your acquisition budget ceiling — against what you spend now.
With zero gross margin there is no lifetime value to spend against — fix the margin first.
Why trust this calculator
Last updated
June 17, 2026
Coverage
9 markets · 8 currencies
Privacy
Calculated in-browser · no data stored
Pricing
Free forever · no sign-up
Your honest feedback shapes what we build next. Takes 30 seconds, fully anonymous — we don't ask for your name or email.