Skip to main content
Calcrux
Ecommerce Seller OperationsFree · No sign-upReal-time

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Calculator

The EOQ calculator with orders/year, cycle days, and bulk discount check.

Updated Reviewed by Sajid Hussain· Editor

ShareLinkedIn
How much should you order?

The EOQ calculator that goes past the bare square root

Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the order size that minimises your total annual inventory cost by balancing the fixed cost of placing orders against the per-unit cost of holding stock — the exact answer to "how much should I order each time?" This EOQ calculator uses the Wilson formula — √(2 × demand × ordering cost ÷ holding cost per unit per year) — to find that optimum and then shows orders per year, cycle in days, average inventory on hand, and the ordering-vs-holding cost split that proves the math is working. It also tests supplier bulk-price offers: enter a discount quantity and price and the calculator compares total annual cost — purchase plus ordering plus holding — at the deal versus the EOQ, then names the winner.

Holding vs ordering — the fundamental tension. Order too much at once and you tie up cash and warehouse space in slow-moving stock — your holding cost balloons. Order too little, too often, and you rack up freight, paperwork, and receiving labour on every tiny order — your ordering cost balloons. The EOQ is the sweet spot: at that order size, ordering cost and holding cost are exactly equal, and the total is at its lowest.

The Wilson EOQ formula, in full. EOQ = √( (2 × annual demand × ordering cost) ÷ holding cost per unit per year ). Most free tools stop there. We also show orders per year, cycle in days, average inventory, and the total annual cost split into its ordering and holding halves — so you can see the balance for yourself.

Two ways to enter holding cost. Enter it as a flat figure (e.g. 3 per unit per year) if you know it. If you only know the rule of thumb, switch to carrying-cost-% mode and enter 20–30% of unit value — that's a typical range once storage, tied-up capital, insurance, and shrinkage are added up. Both paths feed the same math.

The quantity-discount decision. Suppliers love to dangle a lower unit price for bulk orders — but ordering more than the EOQ means carrying more stock, and the extra holding cost can quietly eat the discount. Enter the bulk quantity and its price and we compare total annual cost — purchase plus ordering plus holding — at the deal versus at the EOQ, then tell you which wins and by how much.

Quick facts

Headline answer
Economic Order Quantity (units per order)
Plus the operations
Orders/year · Cycle days · Average inventory
Cost breakdown
Ordering + holding cost (equal at the EOQ)
Holding input
Flat per-unit OR % carrying-cost rate
Bulk-discount check
Does a price break beat the EOQ?
Works in any currency
Currency-agnostic — no conversion needed
How it works

From three numbers to your optimal order quantity

Four short steps to the order size that costs you the least.

01

Enter annual demand

How many units you sell or use in a year. If you only know monthly, multiply by 12 first.

02

Add your ordering cost

The fixed cost of placing and receiving one order — freight, customs, admin, and stocking labour, whatever the order size.

03

Add your holding cost

What it costs to keep one unit in stock for a year — flat, or as a % of the unit value (20–30% is typical).

04

Read the EOQ

Get the optimal order quantity, orders per year, your cycle in days, the total annual cost, and an optional bulk-discount verdict.

Steps to use the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Calculator: Enter annual demand, Add your ordering cost, Add your holding cost, Read the EOQ.

Formula

Exactly what the calculator computes

No black boxes — the Wilson EOQ and everything we derive from it, in plain algebra.

01

Economic Order Quantity (Wilson EOQ)

EOQ = √( (2 × D × S) ÷ H )

D = annual demand (units), S = ordering cost per order, H = holding cost per unit per year. This is the order size that minimises the total of ordering + holding cost. The 2 comes from the average-inventory term (H is charged on EOQ ÷ 2).

02

Holding cost from a carrying-cost rate

H = Unit Cost × Carrying-Cost Rate %

If you enter holding cost as a percentage of unit value instead of a flat figure, we convert it first. A 12 unit cost at a 25% carrying rate gives H = 3 per unit per year.

03

Orders per year and cycle length

Orders/yr = D ÷ EOQ · Cycle Days = 365 ÷ Orders/yr

How often you reorder, and how many days each batch lasts. The cycle is when you would place the next order — pair it with a reorder-point calculation for the WHEN.

04

Annual ordering and holding cost

Ordering = (D ÷ EOQ) × S · Holding = (EOQ ÷ 2) × H

Average inventory across a cycle is EOQ ÷ 2 (stock falls evenly from EOQ to 0). At the EOQ these two costs are exactly equal — the defining property of the optimum.

05

Total annual inventory cost

Total = (D ÷ EOQ) × S + (EOQ ÷ 2) × H

The combined cost the EOQ minimises. Purchase cost (D × unit price) is left out because it depends only on demand, not on how you split the orders — so it does not change the EOQ.

Worked example

12,000 units a year, 50 to order, 3 to hold

Watch the EOQ balance ordering against holding — and prove the two costs land equal.

Scenario

You sell 12,000 units/year. It costs $50.00 to place and receive one order, and $3.00 to keep one unit in stock for a year. How much should you order each time?

1

Step 1 · Plug into the EOQ formula

EOQ = √( (2 × 12,000 × $50.00) ÷ $3.00 ) = √(1,200,000 ÷ 3) = √400,000 ≈ 632 units.

EOQ ≈ 632 units

2

Step 2 · How often you order

Orders per year = 12,000 ÷ 632 units ≈ 18.97. Cycle = 365 ÷ 18.97 ≈ 19 days between orders.

18.97 orders/year · ~19 days

3

Step 3 · The two costs balance

Annual ordering = (12,000 ÷ 632 units) × $50.00 ≈ 18.97 orders × $50.00 ≈ $948.68. Annual holding = (632 units ÷ 2) × $3.00 ≈ $948.68. The two halves are exactly equal — the EOQ's defining property.

Ordering ≈ $948.68 = Holding ≈ $948.68

4

Step 4 · Total annual inventory cost

Total = $948.68 + $948.68 ≈ $1,897.37. Order more or less than 632 units and this total only goes up.

Minimum total ≈ $1,897.37

The takeaway

Ordering 632 units units at a time — about 18.97 times a year, roughly one order every 19 days — minimises your total inventory cost at roughly $1,897.37. Now add a supplier bulk-discount quantity and price to test whether buying more in one go beats the EOQ once the extra holding cost is counted.

Reference points

How to read your EOQ result

EOQ outputs are situational, not a single league table — but these ranges help you sanity-check the numbers against how most ecommerce and small-manufacturing operations run.

MetricPoorAverageGoodExcellent

Carrying-cost rate (% of value)

NetSuite Inventory Carrying Cost Guide 2025
> 40%30–40%20–30%< 20%

Orders per year per SKU

APQC Supply Chain Management Benchmarks 2024
> 52 (weekly+)24–526–244–12

Order cycle (days between orders)

ShipBob Supply Chain Benchmark Report 2025
< 77–1515–6030–90

Ordering ÷ holding cost balance

Wilson (1934) EOQ Optimality Condition — INFORMS Operations Research
Wildly skewedWithin 2×Within 1.3×Equal (at EOQ)

Inventory turns per year

Deloitte Global Powers of Retailing 2025
< 44–88–1212+
Why this calculator

Calcrux vs other EOQ calculators

Most free EOQ tools print the square root and stop. We turn it into a decision: orders, cycle, costs, and a real bulk-discount comparison.

FeatureCalcruxOmni CalculatorSpreadsheet
Economic order quantity (the EOQ)Manual
Orders per year + cycle in daysRareManual
Annual ordering vs holding cost splitManual
Total annual inventory cost at the EOQSomeManual
Holding cost as a % carrying rateRareManual
Quantity-discount-vs-EOQ decisionManual
Plain-language warnings on odd results
Works in any currencyMost US-only
Free, no signupMost
Common mistakes

Why EOQ numbers come out wrong

Mixing up annual and monthly demand

Why it matters

The EOQ formula needs DEMAND PER YEAR. Plug in a monthly figure and the EOQ comes out about 3.5× too small (the demand sits under a square root), so you order far too little, far too often.

Fix

Always annualise first: monthly units × 12. We label the field "units per year" for exactly this reason.

Forgetting most of the ordering cost

Why it matters

Ordering cost is not just the PO. It includes freight, customs, inspection, receiving labour, and the buyer's time. Count only the purchase-order fee and the EOQ collapses, pushing you toward uneconomically frequent orders.

Fix

Add up everything it takes to place AND receive one order, whatever the size. A realistic figure is usually higher than people expect.

Under-counting holding cost

Why it matters

Holding cost is more than warehouse rent. It includes the capital tied up in stock, insurance, obsolescence, and shrinkage. Most businesses carry 20–30% of inventory value per year — far above bare storage rent.

Fix

Use the carrying-cost-% mode and enter a realistic 20–30% of unit value if you do not have a precise flat figure.

Treating the EOQ as an exact target

Why it matters

The total-cost curve is flat near the bottom — ordering 10–20% above or below the EOQ barely changes your cost. Chasing the exact number while ignoring case packs or supplier minimums wastes effort.

Fix

Round the EOQ to a practical order size: a full case, pallet, container, or your supplier's minimum order quantity. Close is good enough.

Accepting every bulk discount on instinct

Why it matters

A lower unit price feels like a win, but ordering far above the EOQ to get it can raise holding cost more than it saves on price — a net loss that hides in next year's storage bill.

Fix

Use the bulk-discount check: it compares total annual cost (purchase + ordering + holding) at the deal vs the EOQ and tells you the real saving — or loss.

Using EOQ for erratic or seasonal demand

Why it matters

EOQ assumes steady, predictable demand. For lumpy, highly seasonal, or fast-declining products, a single EOQ can leave you over- or under-stocked at the wrong moment.

Fix

Use EOQ for stable runners. For seasonal or volatile SKUs, plan order-by-order and lean on the restock calculator with a safety-stock buffer instead.

Tips

Get the most out of your EOQ

Round to a practical pack

The cost curve is flat at the bottom, so round the EOQ up to a full case, pallet, or supplier minimum. The cost penalty for being a bit off is tiny.

Recompute when inputs move

When freight, demand, or storage costs change, the EOQ shifts. Re-run it each season or after a supplier renegotiation rather than reusing last year's number.

Lower ordering cost to order leaner

EDI, standing orders, and consolidated POs cut the per-order cost — which lowers the EOQ and lets you carry less stock without paying more to order.

Pair EOQ with a reorder point

EOQ is HOW MUCH; the reorder point (lead-time demand + safety stock) is WHEN. Use the restock calculator alongside this one for the full picture.

Watch the cycle vs shelf life

If the cycle in days exceeds the product's shelf life or your storage window, cap the order below the EOQ regardless of cost — spoilage beats any saving.

Test every bulk offer

Before saying yes to a price break, run it through the discount check. The extra holding cost on the bigger order often erases the headline saving.

Use cases

When to reach for the EOQ calculator

The Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Calculator works across every stage of the workflow.

Ecommerce sellers restocking SKUs

Decide how many units to reorder per shipment so freight and storage costs are balanced rather than guessed.

Amazon FBA sellers

Size each inbound shipment so storage fees and reorder freight net to the lowest total — then time it with the restock calculator.

Small manufacturers buying raw materials

Set batch purchase sizes for components to minimise combined setup/ordering and carrying cost.

Wholesalers weighing a bulk discount

Check whether a supplier price break for a larger order actually beats ordering at the EOQ once holding cost is counted.

Inventory and ops planners

Establish a baseline order quantity and reorder cadence per SKU, then layer safety stock and lead time on top.

Students and analysts

Work through the classic Wilson EOQ with every intermediate figure shown — ideal for learning or checking coursework.

Glossary

Inventory ordering vocabulary

Every important term you'll encounter in this calculator and the broader topic.

Economic Order Quantity (EOQ)
The order size that minimises total annual inventory cost by balancing ordering cost against holding cost. The answer to "how much should I order each time?"
Ordering cost
The fixed cost of placing and receiving one order, regardless of size: freight, customs, admin, inspection, and receiving labour.
Holding (carrying) cost
The annual cost of keeping one unit in stock: storage, tied-up capital, insurance, obsolescence, and shrinkage. Often 20–30% of unit value.
Carrying-cost rate
Holding cost expressed as a percentage of inventory value rather than a flat per-unit figure. Multiply by unit cost to get holding cost per unit per year.
Order cycle
The time between orders — 365 ÷ orders per year. How many days one batch of stock lasts before you reorder.
Average inventory
The typical stock on hand across a cycle. For steady demand it is EOQ ÷ 2, since stock falls evenly from a full order down to zero.
Wilson EOQ
The classic square-root EOQ formula, named after R. H. Wilson, who popularised it in 1934. The model this calculator implements.
Quantity discount
A lower unit price a supplier offers for ordering in larger volumes. Worth taking only when the price saving beats the extra holding cost of the bigger order.
Reorder point
The stock level that triggers a new order — lead-time demand plus safety stock. EOQ sets the order size; the reorder point sets the timing.
Help & answers

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about how the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) Calculator works.

01What is the economic order quantity (EOQ)?

The order size that minimises total annual inventory cost by balancing ordering cost against holding cost. Order more than the EOQ: too much stock, high holding cost. Order less: too many orders, high ordering cost. At the EOQ the two costs are exactly equal and the combined cost is lowest.

02What is the EOQ formula?

EOQ = √( (2 × D × S) ÷ H ), where D = annual demand, S = ordering cost per order, H = holding cost per unit per year. Example: D=12,000, S=50, H=3 → EOQ = √(1,200,000 ÷ 3) = √400,000 ≈ 632 units. This calculator computes that and shows every intermediate step.

03How do I calculate the optimal order quantity?

Three numbers: annual demand, cost per order, and holding cost per unit per year. Enter them and the EOQ is returned instantly — along with orders per year, cycle in days, and total annual cost at the optimum.

04What counts as ordering cost and holding cost?

Ordering cost: everything to place and receive one order (freight, admin, inspection, labour). Holding cost: keeping one unit for a year (space, capital, insurance, shrinkage) — typically 20–30% of unit value per year. Use the carrying-cost-% mode if unsure.

05Why are ordering cost and holding cost equal at the EOQ?

A mathematical property of the model: as order size increases, ordering cost falls while holding cost rises. They cross at the EOQ — that crossing point is the minimum. When the two costs are equal, the total is at its lowest. It's a useful sanity check on your result.

06Should I always take a supplier bulk discount?

No. A lower unit price often comes with extra holding cost that outweighs the saving. The right test: total annual cost (purchase + ordering + holding) at the bulk quantity vs at the EOQ. Enter the bulk quantity and price and the calculator runs the comparison and names the winner.

07Does the EOQ change if my unit purchase price changes?

Not on its own. Purchase cost (demand × price) is the same regardless of order size, so it doesn't affect the EOQ. Unit price only matters in a discount comparison, where a lower price changes total annual cost — which the bulk-discount check handles.

08How many orders per year and how often should I reorder?

Orders/year = demand ÷ EOQ; cycle = 365 ÷ orders per year. In the worked example, 12,000 ÷ 632 ≈ 19 orders a year, one every 19 days. EOQ sets HOW MUCH; the cycle hints at WHEN — but for a precise reorder trigger you also need lead time and safety stock.

09What if the EOQ comes out as a fraction or an odd number?

Normal. The cost curve is flat near the optimum, so rounding to a practical size barely changes cost. Round up to a full case, pallet, or supplier minimum. If the EOQ is below one unit, your holding cost is very high relative to ordering cost — double-check both.

10When should I not use the EOQ model?

EOQ assumes steady predictable demand and constant costs. It fits poorly for highly seasonal items, short shelf lives, fast-declining SKUs, or severe storage caps. For those, plan order by order and rely on a reorder point with safety stock instead.

11Does this EOQ calculator work in my currency?

Yes. EOQ is currency-agnostic — the quantity is the same in any currency. Enter costs in your local currency and the calculator shows all monetary outputs (ordering cost, holding cost, total, discount saving) in that same currency. No conversion, no hidden currency assumption.

12What is the difference between EOQ and the reorder point?

EOQ is HOW MUCH to order — the quantity that minimises cost. Reorder point is WHEN to order — the stock level that triggers a new order (lead-time demand + safety stock). You need both; the restock calculator handles the reorder point.

Category

Ecommerce Seller Operations

Subcategory

inventory operations

Availability

Global · 9 markets

Price

Free forever

Topics

eoq calculatoreconomic order quantityoptimal order quantityinventory order costhow much to orderreorder quantitywilson eoqinventory managementholding costordering costhow to calculate eoqinventory cost minimisation

Explore 500+ more tools

Calculators, simulators, and decision tools for every stage of business operations.